All categories/Code and debugging
Writing code and tests · Level Advanced · Coding Coding Dependencies
Dependency choice: should we add this library
A feature needs a new dependency. Is it worth it?
Prompt
Three defaults: define the input-output contract, then the error branches, then the happy path. An implementation without error handling is not finished.
Task: A feature needs a new dependency. Is it worth it?
[Before you start, do three things]
1. Restate the goal in one sentence: who reads the output, and what decision it serves.
2. If I have not given you the following, ask me. Do not assume:
- can existing dependencies do it
- library maintenance and size
- licence
3. Say how you plan to do it (at most 5 steps) and wait for my go-ahead.
[Go through each of these]
- estimate the cost of writing it ourselves
- check recent commits, issue response, advisories
- state who owns upgrades and vulnerability response
- offer a do-not-add alternative
[Process]
1. State the contract: inputs, outputs, errors, side effects
2. List every error branch and boundary first
3. Then the happy path, one responsibility per function
4. Test key paths: one normal, two failure cases
5. State when this code would fail
[Output]
Contract, errors, happy path, tests, failure conditions.
[Do not]
- Never ignore an error return
- Never swallow exceptions
- No magic numbers; name them
- Do not log-and-continue instead of returning an errorWhat to state before it starts
Leave these unsaid and the model fills them with an assumption. Most 'wrong answers' start here.
- can existing dependencies do it
- library maintenance and size
- licence
Go through each of these
Where this kind of work most often goes wrong. Already in the prompt, so you do not have to remember it.
- estimate the cost of writing it ourselves
- check recent commits, issue response, advisories
- state who owns upgrades and vulnerability response
- offer a do-not-add alternative