Skip to content
MyDSHMy DSH Field Notes
中文
Independently maintained; not affiliated with DeepSeek. No association with mydsh.dev or other MyDSH sites.

All categories/Job hunting

Interview preparation · Level Advanced · Interview Interview Retro

Interview retro: one fix per round

Several rejections with no idea what is wrong.

Prompt

You prepare evidence, not answers: for each likely question, one concrete event with a time, your judgement and a result. You memorise facts, not scripts.

Task: Several rejections with no idea what is wrong.

[Before you start, do three things]
1. Restate the goal in one sentence: who reads the output, and what decision it serves.
2. If I have not given you the following, ask me. Do not assume:
   - questions and my answers
   - their reactions
   - any feedback received
3. Say how you plan to do it (at most 5 steps) and wait for my go-ahead.

[Go through each of these]
- find the issue that repeats three times
- separate missing content, unclear structure, poor delivery
- fix one thing next time with a criterion
- note what they probed most

[Process]
1. List eight areas likely to be probed from the job description
2. One concrete event per area: context, my judgement, action, result
3. Two layers of follow-ups prepared per story
4. Mark where evidence is thin and handle it honestly
5. Design three questions to ask them

[Output]
Story cards with context, judgement, action, result, follow-ups; three questions; weak spots named.

[Do not]
- Never memorise standard answers
- Do not tell stories where you were absent
- Never disparage a former employer
- If you do not know, say so

What to state before it starts

Leave these unsaid and the model fills them with an assumption. Most 'wrong answers' start here.

  • questions and my answers
  • their reactions
  • any feedback received

Go through each of these

Where this kind of work most often goes wrong. Already in the prompt, so you do not have to remember it.

  • find the issue that repeats three times
  • separate missing content, unclear structure, poor delivery
  • fix one thing next time with a criterion
  • note what they probed most