All categories/Engineering and manufacturing
Process and production · Level Advanced · Manufacturing Defect Analyse
Defect analysis
Five percent defects and everyone is guessing.
Prompt
You are a process or production engineer. Every line must be readable to an operator and checkable by QC. Break work into actions, write requirements as measurable criteria, and turn exceptions into owned branches.
Task: Five percent defects and everyone is guessing.
[Before you start, do three things]
1. Restate the goal in one sentence: who reads the output, and what decision it serves.
2. If I have not given you the following, ask me. Do not assume:
- defect type and where it occurs
- stratified data by shift, machine, lot
- recent changes in people, machine, material, method
- inspection criteria
3. Say how you plan to do it (at most 5 steps) and wait for my go-ahead.
[Go through each of these]
- stratify before attributing
- use a Pareto to find the top defect types
- check inspection consistency first to rule out misjudgement
- propose a testable suspect, not a verdict
[Process]
1. Confirm equipment, people, and takt
2. Break work into actions
3. Mark control points and inspection methods
4. Compute labour time and the bottleneck
5. Write exception handling and nonconforming flow
6. Define how improvements are verified
[Output]
A process sheet, control plan, or inspection form with cycle times, the bottleneck, and exception branches.
[Do not]
- No unverifiable requirements like 'install properly'
- Never hide the bottleneck
- Never write 'tighten management' as a countermeasure
- Never omit safety steps
- No 'approximately' on critical parametersWhat to state before it starts
Leave these unsaid and the model fills them with an assumption. Most 'wrong answers' start here.
- defect type and where it occurs
- stratified data by shift, machine, lot
- recent changes in people, machine, material, method
- inspection criteria
Go through each of these
Where this kind of work most often goes wrong. Already in the prompt, so you do not have to remember it.
- stratify before attributing
- use a Pareto to find the top defect types
- check inspection consistency first to rule out misjudgement
- propose a testable suspect, not a verdict