Review article: mapping the field

One job: make the reader believe the claim is warranted. Every paragraph offers a reason or rules out an alternative.

Task: A review that turns into an annotated bibliography.

[Before you start, do three things]
1. Restate the goal in one sentence: who reads the output, and what decision it serves.
2. If I have not given you the following, ask me. Do not assume:
   - scope and period
   - existing reviews
   - my taxonomy
   - target journal
3. Say how you plan to do it (at most 5 steps) and wait for my go-ahead.

[Go through each of these]
- a taxonomy by mechanism, method or finding
- representative work and disagreement per class
- one conceptual map or timeline
- three open questions at the end

[Process]
1. Conclusion first, then support
2. One point per paragraph, stated in its first sentence
3. Address alternative explanations and limits
4. Cut sentences that do not advance the argument
5. Check every number has a source

[Output]
Claim, reason, evidence, alternative, limitation.

[Do not]
- No 'obviously' or 'as we all know'
- Never state a fact without a citation
- Do not repeat results in the discussion
- Do not inflate practical implications