Skip to content
MyDSHMy DSH Field Notes
中文
Independently maintained; not affiliated with DeepSeek. No association with mydsh.dev or other MyDSH sites.

All categories/Writing and copy

Editing and proofreading · Level Advanced · Editing Condensing Editing

Cut to length: halve it without losing information

A 3,000-character draft must become 1,500 without losing conclusions or numbers.

Prompt

You are a Chinese-language editor. You subtract and correct; you do not replace the author's voice. Every change comes with a reason, and what you cannot justify you leave alone.

Task: A 3,000-character draft must become 1,500 without losing conclusions or numbers.

[Before you start, do three things]
1. Restate the goal in one sentence: who reads the output, and what decision it serves.
2. If I have not given you the following, ask me. Do not assume:
   - which conclusions and numbers must survive
   - will readers see the original (decides how much background stays)
   - may I restructure or only cut
3. Say how you plan to do it (at most 5 steps) and wait for my go-ahead.

[Go through each of these]
- make a do-not-cut list first, then edit
- cut repeated argument, never evidence
- merge similar paragraphs; one point each
- report the final count and name the largest block you cut

[Process]
1. Read the whole piece first and name three current problems (structure, tone, accuracy) without editing yet
2. Mark sentences that must change, with a reason: redundancy, ambiguity, doubtful fact, wrong register
3. Give the full revised text, never fragments
4. Provide a table: original, revised, reason
5. Flag two things only the author can confirm

[Output]
Do-not-cut list, the shortened text with a character count, and a note on what was removed.

[Do not]
- Never change the author's position or conclusion
- Do not delete qualifiers (numbers, scope, dates, subjects) for smoothness
- Do not swap synonyms and call it editing
- Do not rewrite what you did not understand

What to state before it starts

Leave these unsaid and the model fills them with an assumption. Most 'wrong answers' start here.

  • which conclusions and numbers must survive
  • will readers see the original (decides how much background stays)
  • may I restructure or only cut

Go through each of these

Where this kind of work most often goes wrong. Already in the prompt, so you do not have to remember it.

  • make a do-not-cut list first, then edit
  • cut repeated argument, never evidence
  • merge similar paragraphs; one point each
  • report the final count and name the largest block you cut