跳到正文
MyDSH我的 DSH 实战笔记
English
独立维护,非DeepSeek官方;与mydsh.dev等其他MyDSH站点无关联。

首页/English Corner/英文讨论区

英文读者常见问题:每个都指回中文页

英文读者最常问的其实是同一批问题,每次都要重新解释一遍。

已核验版本与环境核验日期2026-11-14
来源
本站实测结论与前几周遇到的问题
核验日期
2026-11-14

1. Is this an official DeepSeek site?

No. It is an independent notes site written from real runs by a user. Nothing here is an official statement, and no page uses DeepSeek branding. See关于页。

2. Why does a plugin I installed make the app hang with no output?

Most likely a missing client.inject package. Measured: a plugin naming six client packages the host lacks produced seventy seconds of zero output, a live process, and no error. There is no version-gate refusal to look for. See插件核验表。

3. Why did the version gate not stop me installing an incompatible plugin?

Because it does not exist. Measured on 0.1.2-alpha.5: a plugin requiring >=0.2.0-rc.2 installed fine, composed fine in --dump-config, and was refused by nothing. Of the 87 first-party packages, zero declare engines.dsh. See版本门那条。

4. My token numbers are much lower than yours. Why?

Probably reading only some of the three figures. Measured: on one session, reading the last usage per turn gave 28,827 while summing per step gave 126,551. Also, inputTokens is cache-miss input only; cache hits are separate. See实测量法。

5. Is a cache hit cheaper even when total tokens go up?

Yes. Measured: run two used 51 percent more total tokens than run one at a sixth of the cost, because 47,872 of its tokens were cache hits at $0.003 per million against 16,210 cache-miss tokens at $0.15. See缓存命中那条。

6. Which number should I optimise — tokens or money?

Money, and within money the output line. Measured across six tasks, output accounted for 59 to 69 percent of cost because output is priced 200 times a cache-hit input token. Cutting output and step count saves more than cutting input. See成本基线。

7. Can I trust the English pages for exact wording?

For commands and numbers, yes. For prose, no. Every English page is a generated translation with no native review. Where a detail is ambiguous, the Chinese page governs. See译校状态。

这七条的共性:每一条的答案都能指到一个有原始数据的页面,而不是靠解释。所以英文读者问起来,不必重新论证一遍——给链接就行。

怎么算跑通

照着逐条对,全过才算完成。有一条没过,先解决它再往下。

  • 七条答案每条都能指到具体页面
  • 没有被问到时需要重新论证
  • 第7条明确说了英文页不可当措辞权威

会失败在哪

现象 / 原因 / 怎么办,按实际踩到的顺序写。

现象原因怎么办
读者问的问题不在七条里说明它还不够普遍按发帖须知收集环境三要素,够普遍就写成新的一节

来源

标「已核验」的,来自本站实跑;标「公开资料整理」的,逐条附出处。